USPTO serial 78756100
DESC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOLTZ, ALLISON
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DESC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Colonia Bosques de las Lomas, MX
Colonia Bosques de las Lomas, MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew R. Mowers
Matthew R. Mowers BROOKS KUSHMAN P.C.1000 TOWN CENTER, 22ND FLOORSOUTHFIELD, MI 48075-1238UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS AND PUBLICITY SERVICES, NAMELY, ADVERTISING AND PUBLICITY SERVICES, CONSULTING SERVICES RELATING TO PUBLICITY, ADVERTISING AGENCY SERVICES, BUSINESS CONSULTATION, BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, BUSINESS MANAGEMENT PLANNING, BUSINESS SUPERVISION, BUSINESS MARKETING CONSULTING SERVICES, BUSINESS ACQUISITIONS CONSULTATION | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | FINANCIAL SERVICES, NAMELY, FINANCIAL ANALYSIS AND CONSULTATION, CAPITAL INVESTMENT CONSULTATION, FINANCIAL INVESTMENT IN THE FIELD OF SECURITIES | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND RENOVATION OF BUILDINGS AND PROPERTY; CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION; CONSTRUCTION PLANNING; CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT; CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, NAMELY, PLANNING, LAYING OUT AND CUSTOM CONSTRUCTION OF RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL COMMUNITIES; CONSULTATION IN BUILDING CONSTRUCTION SUPERVISION; RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | TRANSMISSION OF SOUND, PICTURE, VIDEO AND DATA SIGNALS; TRANSMISSION OF INFORMATION; TRANSMISSION OF INFORMATION ON OPTICAL TELECOMMUNICATION NETWORKS; DATA TRANSMISSION AND RECEPTION SERVICES VIA TELECOMMUNICATION MEANS; TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES, NAMELY, LOCAL AND LONG DISTANCE TRANSMISSION OF VOICE, DATA, GRAPHICS BY MEANS OF TELEPHONE, TELEGRAPHIC, CABLE, RADIO, AND SATELLITE TRANSMISSIONS; ELECTRONIC, ELECTRIC, AND DIGITAL TRANSMISSION OF VOICE, DATA, IMAGES, SIGNALS, AND MESSAGES; WIRELESS ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF VOICE SIGNALS, DATA, FACSIMILES, IMAGES AND INFORMATION | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | STORAGE OF GOODS FOR OTHERS; DELIVERY OF GOODS FOR OTHERS BY MEANS OF AIR, RAIL, SHIP OR TRUCK | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | PERMANENT PRESS TREATMENT OF FABRICS AND TEXTILES; HEAT TREATMENT AND COATING OF SYNTHETIC RUBBER, PHENOL, METHYL, METACRYLATE AND CARBON BLACK, PHOSPHATES, ACRYLIC LAMINATE, NATURAL PIGMENTS, LAMINATED PLASTICS AND EMULSIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | TRAINING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF HUMAN RESOURCES, MANAGEMENT, MANAGEMENT DEVELOPING AND COACHING SKILLS, INDUSTRIAL AND OPERATION SKILLS; ARRANGING SEMINARS AND CONFERENCES; ARRANGING PROFESSIONAL WORKSHOPS AND TRAINING COURSES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DESC, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by DESC, S.A. DE C.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named DESC
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 19, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 19, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 2, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 25, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 25, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 18, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 20, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 26, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 19, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 2, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |