Drawing for THE NATURAL DENTIST HEALTHY GUMS

USPTO serial 78756121

THE NATURAL DENTIST HEALTHY GUMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AWRICH, ELLEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE NATURAL DENTIST HEALTHY GUMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan Barbieri Montgomery, Esq., Charles E. Weinstein, Esq., Bruce R. Parker, Esq., and Sam Hudson, Esq.

Susan Barbieri Montgomery, Esq. Foley Hoag LLPSeaport World Trade Center West155 Seaport BoulevardBoston, MA 02210

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003NON-MEDICATED ORAL HEALTH CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, MOUTH RINSES, MOUTH WASHES, BREATH FRESHENING CHEWING GUM IN STICKS, TOOTH PASTES, AND TOOTH GELS, FOR THE CARE OF THE ORAL CAVITYACTIVE—
005MEDICATED ORAL HEALTH CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, MOUTH RINSES, MOUTH WASHES, BREATH FRESHENING CHEWING GUM IN STICKS FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES, TOOTH PASTES, TOOTH GELS, AND MOUTH DISSOLVABLE FLAVORED EDIBLE FILMS, FOR THE CARE OF THE ORAL CAVITYACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 9, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 3, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 3, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 29, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 20, 2009TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Aug 20, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 20, 2009OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jul 30, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 30, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 8, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 13, 2007OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 13, 2007OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 16, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 27, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 29, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 28, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 14, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 13, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 26, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 19, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 24, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 22, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance