USPTO serial 78756126
LADYBUG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LADYBUG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London, England, GB
London, England, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan M. Freedman
Susan M. Freedman NIXON PEABODY LLP401 9TH ST NW STE 900WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2145UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use; cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations; soaps, namely body soaps, liquid soaps and skin soaps; perfumery; essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions; dentifrices; disposable wipes impregnated with chemicals or compounds for personal hygiene and household use; wet wipes namely pre-moistened cosmetic and cleansing wipes; baby bath soap; baby wash; baby shampoo; baby oil; baby lotion; talcum powder; baby eau de toilette; cotton wool pads for cosmetic purposes; cotton wool balls for cosmetic and cleansing purposes; ear swabs | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Sanitary preparations for medical use; dietetic foods and dietetic baby food adapted for medical use; medical plasters, dressings for wounds; material for stopping teeth; dental wax; all purpose disinfectants; preparations for destroying vermin; fungicides, herbicides, medicated shampoo; medicated soap; medicated hand wash; medicated bath preparation; disposable wipes impregnated with chemicals or compounds for medical use | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Spectacles, eyeglasses, sunglasses | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Babies bottles; dummies, namely pacifiers; teething rings; pacifiers; teats | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Disposable napkins; diapers of cellulose or paper; disposable liners for napkins; bibs of paper or cellulose; disposable paper wipes not impregnated with chemicals or compounds; cellulose or tissue for cosmetic use; toilet paper; disposable paper training pants; disposable paper underpants for babies | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Household or kitchen utensils namely, pots and pan scrapers, rolling pins, spatulas, turners, whisks; containers for household or kitchen use; combs and sponges for household and kitchen purposes, not for cosmetic use; brush-making materials; brushes, namely bottle-cleaning brushes, washing brushes; steel wool for cleaning; unworked or semi-worked glass, not for building purposes; glassware, namely beverage glassware, glassware containers for storage purposes, glassware plates, glassware bowls; figurines of porcelain; earthenware, namely earthenware containers for storage purposes, earthenware basins, earthenware bowls; baby bowls; baby feeding apparatus, namely, cups with no handles, bowls, plates, mugs, and cups | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Textile fabrics and textile goods, namely, textile fabrics for home interiors, towels, bed sheets, bed blankets; fabric bed covers; table covers,namely, table linen, table runners of fabric | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Woolworths plc
- Other trademarks owned by Woolworths plc
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named LADYBUG
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 4, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 1, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 11, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 2, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 10, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 20, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 18, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 14, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 30, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |