USPTO serial 78756248
MAXCRAFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAXCRAFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jami A. Gekas
Jami A. Gekas Wildman, Harrold, Allen & Dixon LLP225 West Wacker DriveSuite 2800Chicago, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Power tools and accessories therefor, namely, handheld power drills, power saws and grinders, drill bits, sanding wheels and pads, and grinding wheels, air compressors, and hydraulic jacks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 21, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 11, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 2, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 2, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 28, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 28, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 29, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 21, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 21, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 22, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 7, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 23, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 23, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |