Drawing for HISTORYPRO REVIEW

USPTO serial 78756548

HISTORYPRO REVIEW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HISTORYPRO REVIEW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott W. Pink, Esq.

SCOTT W PINK ESQ DLA PIPER RUDNICK GRAY CARY US LLP400 CAPITOL MALL STE 2400SACRAMENTO, CA 95814-4428UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for evaluation of real estate appraisals and prediction of loan risk and fraud in the fields of mortgage lending and investingACTIVEMay 31, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 2, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Oct 2, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 10, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 23, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance