CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SHEILA STOTTS HAIR TODAY

USPTO serial 78756628

SHEILA STOTTS HAIR TODAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHOE, KELLY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHEILA STOTTS HAIR TODAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sharon Blinkoff

Sharon Blinkoff VENABLE LLPP.O. BOX 34385Washington, DC 20043UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Electric and battery-powered hair trimmers, electric hair clippers, electric hair cutters, hair cutting scissors, non-electric hair clippersACTIVE—
009Electric hair crimper, electric hair curlers, electric hair curling irons, electric hair straightener, electric rotary hair brush for styling a user's hair, electrically heated hair brushes, hot air hair brushesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 16, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 16, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 14, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 14, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 14, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 17, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 17, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 3, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 3, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 3, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 3, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 17, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 16, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 13, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 30, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Apr 30, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 30, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 24, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 24, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 6, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 6, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 4, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 8, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 6, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 1, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 1, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 27, 2007PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2007APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Mar 22, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 26, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 26, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 2, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 30, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 26, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 23, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 23, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance