Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78756670?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78756670. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns DENIM DESIGN LAB?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78756670, the listed owner(s) include: Robbins, Brian D..

What is USPTO serial number 78756670?

Serial number 78756670 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark DENIM DESIGN LAB. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of DENIM DESIGN LAB?

DENIM DESIGN LAB (78756670) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover DENIM DESIGN LAB?

The public record lists International Classes: 025. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 78756670

DENIM DESIGN LAB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Nov 18, 2005
Status date: Sep 5, 2012
Registration date: —
Examiner: TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
Law office: TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DENIM DESIGN LAB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Robbins, Brian D.
San Clemente, CA, US
Other trademarks owned by Robbins, Brian D.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey Van Hoosear

JEFFREY H LARSON KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN STREET14TH FLOORIRVINE, CA 92614

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
025	Clothing for men and women, namely, pants and jackets made in whole or significant part of denim	ACTIVE	Jan 23, 2006

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Sep 5, 2012	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Sep 5, 2012	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Sep 4, 2012	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Jul 28, 2010	GEA1	NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Jul 28, 2010	GECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Jul 28, 2010	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Jul 7, 2010	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jul 7, 2010	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jul 7, 2010	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 22, 2010	XAEC	EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED	—
Jun 22, 2010	GNEN	NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED	—
Jun 22, 2010	GNEA	EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED	—
Jun 22, 2010	CNEA	EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN	—
Jun 1, 2010	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
May 12, 2010	GEA1	NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
May 12, 2010	GECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
May 12, 2010	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Apr 20, 2010	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Apr 19, 2010	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Apr 19, 2010	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 19, 2009	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2009	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2009	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2009	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Jul 6, 2009	GEA1	NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Jul 6, 2009	GECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Jul 6, 2009	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Jun 25, 2009	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jun 25, 2009	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jun 22, 2009	PARI	TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED	—
Jun 15, 2009	ERFR	TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED	—
Jun 15, 2009	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Jun 15, 2009	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Jun 15, 2009	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Mar 26, 2009	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 26, 2009	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
Dec 13, 2008	GNFN	NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	—
Dec 13, 2008	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 13, 2008	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 21, 2008	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Nov 20, 2008	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Nov 20, 2008	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 21, 2008	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2008	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2008	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2008	RCCK	SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION	—
Oct 30, 2007	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Apr 30, 2007	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Apr 30, 2007	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Oct 13, 2006	GNSL	LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED	—
Oct 13, 2006	CNSL	SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN	—
Sep 15, 2006	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Sep 8, 2006	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Sep 8, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Sep 8, 2006	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 2, 2006	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 25, 2006	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Apr 13, 2006	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Apr 13, 2006	AUPC	AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE	—
Mar 19, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Mar 19, 2006	IUAF	USE AMENDMENT FILED	—
Mar 19, 2006	EAAU	TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED	—
Nov 23, 2005	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—