USPTO serial 78756705
EL MOLINERO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EL MOLINERO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey M. Furr
Jeffrey M. Furr Furr Law Firm2622 Debolt RoadUtica, OH 43080UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Fish ; Game ; Meat; Meat extract; Poultry; Processed, dried and preserved fruits | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | Baking powder; Bread; Cocoa; Coffee; Coffee substitutes ; Flavored ices; Flour; Honey; Ice; Mustard; Pastries; Rice; Sago; Salt; Sauces; Spices; Sugar; Tapioca; Tea; Treacle; Vinegar; Yeast | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Arrocera Los Corrales, Sociedad Anonima
- Other trademarks owned by Arrocera Los Corrales, Sociedad Anonima
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named EL MOLINERO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 26, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 24, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 6, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 31, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |