USPTO serial 78756790
BREVITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BREVITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen R. Bergerson
STEPHEN R BERGERSON FREDRIKSON & BYRON PA200 S 6TH ST STE 4000MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1425UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software which automates the development and integration of other software applications by creating an infrastructure foundation to handle the generic portions of such software and which contains a suite of features including: packages, namely, software packages containing infrastructure foundation to facilitate development of customized service oriented software applications in the nature of a framework for integrating business processes and supporting information technology infrastructure as secure, standardized components that can be reused and combined to address changing business priorities and lifecycle management, namely, managing the flow of data from creation and initial storage to obsolescence and deletion, typeface fonts, graphical user interface software, attributes,namely, attributes software which facilitates development of customized service oriented software applications in the nature of a framework for integrating business processes and supporting information technology infrastructure as secure, standardized components that can be reused and combined to address changing business priorities and lifecycle management, namely, managing the flow of data from creation and initial storage to obsolescence and deletion, enumerated data types, namely, enumerated data software which facilitates development of customized service oriented software applications in the nature of a framework for integrating business processes and supporting information technology infrastructure as secure, standardized components that can be reused and combined to address changing business priorities and lifecycle management, namely, managing the flow of data from creation and initial storage to obsolescence and deletion, systems of measurement, namely, measurement system software, units of currency, namely, currency converter software, localization tools, namely, software tools for localizing data to facilitate development of customizable service oriented software applications in the nature of a framework for integrating business processes and supporting information technology infrastructure as secure, standardized components that can be reused and combined to address changing business priorities and lifecycle management, namely, managing the flow of data from creation and initial storage to obsolescence and deletion, business rules,namely, database featuring compilation of federal business rules, commands, namely,command software which provides basic commands to facilitate development of customized service oriented software applications in the nature of a framework for integrating business processes and supporting information technology infrastructure as secure, standardized components that can be reused and combined to address changing business priorities and lifecycle management, namely, managing the flow of data from creation and initial storage to obsolescence and deletion, event notifications, namely, calendar software that sends notifications when pre-entered dates and events are approaching, and business actions, namely,software providing basic business communication tools in the nature of electronic mail to facilitate development of customized service oriented software applications and lifecycle management; all of which operate without regard to where or how data is stored | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 11, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 27, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 29, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |