Drawing for PURE PAC PURE WATER, PURE TASTE

USPTO serial 78756806

PURE PAC PURE WATER, PURE TASTE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FATHY, DOMINIC
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PURE PAC PURE WATER, PURE TASTE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Philip R. Warn

JOHN H. THOMAS JOHN H. THOMAS, P.C.536 GRANITE AVERICHMOND, VA 23226-2148UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Drinking WaterABANDONED—
040Water treatment and purification namely, softening, filtering, treating, conditioning, processing and dispensing of drinking waterABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 3, 2009MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 3, 2009ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 3, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 3, 2009OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
May 10, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 10, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2007OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 8, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 27, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 28, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 26, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 15, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 15, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 26, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 13, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 25, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance