USPTO serial 78756877
ECO-CARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3522542Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 21, 2008
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ECO-CARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric O. Haugen
Eric O. Haugen HAUGEN LAW FIRM PLLP121 S. Eighth Street1130 TCF TowerMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-2841Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Biodegradable plastic sheets for use in manufacturing credit cards and other commercial use cards; biodegradable plastic cards in sheet form for use in making credit cards and other commercial cards | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 30, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 15, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 15, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 6, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 31, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 31, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 1, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 9, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 19, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 18, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |