USPTO serial 78757233
TASSINI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TASSINI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
Formation Forest Products Ltd.
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey A. Smith
JEFFREY A SMITH MILLEN, WHITE, ZELANO & BRANIGAN PC2200 CLARENDON BLVD STE 1400ARLINGTON, VA 22201-3360UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Flooring products made primarily of wood including non-metal floors, floor panels and floor boards | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INHAUS SURFACES LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by INHAUS SURFACES LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Formation Forest Products Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named TASSINI
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 16, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |