Drawing for Serial No. 78757319

USPTO serial 78757319

Serial No. 78757319

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STEEL, ALYSSA PALADINO
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 78757319?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John A. Clifford

MERCHANT & GOULD PCPO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Motor-driven water agitating apparatus used in aeration of and preventing formation of ice in large bodies of waterACTIVENov 30, 1981

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 5, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 5, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 2, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 13, 2008EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Dec 20, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 20, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 20, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 20, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 20, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 27, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 27, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 29, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 26, 2005MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Nov 25, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance