USPTO serial 78757415
LIL' DICKENS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROWLEY, PAUL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LIL' DICKENS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martha Gayle Barber
Martha Gayle Barber ALSTON & BIRD LLP101 S TRYON ST STE 4000CHARLOTTE, NC 28280-4000UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | BEDDING, NAMELY, SHEET SETS, PILLOW CASES, PILLOW SHAMS, BED BLANKETS, BLANKET THROWS, COMFORTERS, DOWN COMFORTERS, QUILTS, DUVETS, COVERLETS, BED SKIRTS, MATTRESS PADS, BEDDING FOR INFANTS AND CHILDREN, NAMELY BED LINEN, SHEETS, PILLOW CASES, MATTRESS PADS, BLANKETS; UNFITTED FABRIC FURNITURE SLIP COVERS, BEACH TOWELS, BATH TOWELS, BATH SHEETS, SHOWER CURTAINS, FABRIC WINDOW TREATMENTS AND COVERINGS, NAMELY WINDOW VALANCES, AND SHEER CURTAIN PANELS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 18, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 11, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 19, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 26, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 6, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 25, 2006 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 25, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |