USPTO serial 78757511
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Amy E. Carroll
STEVEN W SCHUSTER MCLAUGHLIN & STERN LLP260 MADISON AVE FL 18NEW YORK, NY 10016-2404UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Insurance services, namely, underwriting of casualty insurance, property insurance, general liability insurance, workers' compensation liability insurance, commercial auto insurance, commercial umbrella liability insurance coverage for mercantile and services, restaurant liability insurance, construction liability insurance, and real estate liability insurance, and providing ancillary services thereto, namely insurance administration and insurance claims adjustment; commercial insurance underwriting services in the fields of liability insurance, business interruption insurance, and business property insurance and providing ancillary services thereto, namely insurance administration and insurance claims adjustment; wholesale and retail insurance brokerages in the field of property and casualty insurance; insurance claims adjustment services; insurance services, namely, reinsurance underwriting and brokerage services, insurance administration, insurance consultation, risk management services, claims processing, and claims adjustment services in the field of reinsurance; insurance claims services, namely, providing multi-line loss adjustment services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 8, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 8, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 23, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 11, 2007 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 31, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 25, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 25, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 14, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 14, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |