USPTO serial 78757943
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Menomonee Falls, WI
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew S. McConnell
Andrew S. McConnell Boyle Fredrickson, S.C.840 N. PlankintonMilwaukee, WI 53203UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Submarine sandwiches | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 26, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 27, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 27, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 4, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 26, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |