Drawing for THE HOME OFFICE FROM HELL

USPTO serial 78758184

THE HOME OFFICE FROM HELL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE HOME OFFICE FROM HELL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lynn M. Humphreys

Lynn M. Humphreys MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP425 MARKET STREETSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2482UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Pre-recorded audio and video cassettes, CD-Roms, DVD's and computer software for instructional purposes in the fields of organization and planning of small business enterprises; downloadable publications, namely books, articles, circulars, columns, magazines, newsletters, calendars, pamphlets and seminar materials featuring information in the field of small business enterprisesACTIVE—
016Printed publications, namely, books, articles, circulars, columns, magazines, newsletters, calendars, pamphlets and seminar materials featuring information in the field of small business enterprisesACTIVE—
025T-shirts, sweatshirts, and hatsACTIVE—
035Providing information and advice in the field of small business enterprises via a global communications networkACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, providing a series of television programs and specials and video features in the fields of business and comedy broadcast over television, satellite, audio/video media and internet communications networks; entertainment services, namely conducting contests and sweepstakes; conducting workshops, seminars and conferences in the field of small business enterprises; providing non-downloadable publications, namely books, articles, circulars, columns, magazines, newsletters, calendars, phamphlets and seminar materials featuring information in the field of small business enterprises via a global communications networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 11, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 11, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 1, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 1, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 1, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 20, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 20, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 20, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 3, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 3, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 3, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 22, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 15, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 10, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 16, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 27, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 29, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 27, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 25, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 25, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 25, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 27, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 30, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 29, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance