USPTO serial 78758494
SOUTHERN CHEROKEE NATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SOUTHERN CHEROKEE NATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary K. Price
GARY K PRICE BOWERS HARRISON LLPPO BOX 1287EVANSVILLE, IN 47706-1287UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | association services, namely, promoting the interests of The Southern Cherokee Nation | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 1893 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 9, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 31, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 25, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |