Drawing for NAILESSE

USPTO serial 78758710

NAILESSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRASER, RICHARD
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with NAILESSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Diana K Borden

DIANA K BORDEN GRAVES, DOUGHERTY, HEARON & MOODY, PC401 CONGRESS AVENUE, STE 2200AUSTIN, TX 78701-3790UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Nail care preparationsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 22, 2008MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 22, 2008ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 22, 2008OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 22, 2008OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Dec 31, 2007OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 21, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 15, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 2, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 2, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 2, 2007ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 28, 2007PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jul 26, 2007PBIRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - TQR/NON-ATTY REQUEST—
Jul 13, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 13, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 8, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 8, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 8, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 8, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 7, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 25, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 30, 2005MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Nov 29, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance