Drawing for RED NOSE LIGHTING

USPTO serial 78758751

RED NOSE LIGHTING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUBRAY, KATHERINE M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RED NOSE LIGHTING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dean R. Karau

DEAN R KARAU FREDRIKSON & BYRON PA200 S 6TH ST STE 4000MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1425UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037Installation, maintenance and removal of lighting and decor on residential and commercial buildings and/or outside landscapingABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 1, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Oct 1, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 28, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 22, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 23, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 23, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 9, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 4, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 4, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 31, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 31, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 29, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance