USPTO serial 78758759
PEOPLE READY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWIFT, GILBERT M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PEOPLE READY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William O. Ferron, Jr.
William O. Ferron, Jr. Seed IP Law Group PLLCSuite 5400701 Fifth AvenueSeattle, WA 98104Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | house mark for a full line of business, home, entertainment and game software; operating system software and graphical user interface software; house mark for a full line of software for use on computer networks and network servers, namely, software for administration of computer local area networks and network access server operating software; computer software for developing, managing and operating intranet sites; computer software development tools for network servers and applications; computer software for use by software developers to create, edit and test other computer programs and web sites; compiler programs, editor programs, debugger programs and computer utility programs that perform computer maintenance work used for creating other computer programs; computers; computer hardware; computer peripherals; hand-held computers; personal digital assistants; cellular telephones; wireless email devices, namely, electronic handheld units; television sets; remote controls for televisions, computers and DVD players; electronic equipment for receiving direct broadcast satellite signals, namely, audio and video receivers, satellite dishes, antennas and remote controllers therefor, sold together as a unit; radio pagers; radios; home entertainment electronic equipment, namely, stereo tuners, amplifiers, audio and video receivers, CD players, DVD players and loudspeakers; video recording and playback devices, and monitors and displays therefor; video game machines for use with televisions; interactive video game devices comprised of computer hardware and software and accessories, namely, game consoles, game controllers and software for operating game controllers; DVD drives; memory expansion units for video game consoles; video cable for use with video game consoles; computer hardware and software for viewing digital images stored on disk on a television set; computer keyboards; computer cursor control devices, namely, computer mouse, key pads, trackballs, joysticks and racing wheels for controlling video game input; prerecorded videotapes, audio tapes, CDs and DVDs featuring sound and video in the fields of music, live action programs, motion pictures and animated cartoons; motion picture films featuring comedy, drama, action, adventure and animation; motion picture films for broadcast on television featuring comedy, drama, action, adventure and animation; and covers for computer game consoles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 28, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 11, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 5, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 29, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 28, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 5, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 16, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 27, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 5, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |