USPTO serial 78758920
V EXTREME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 22, 2007
- Examiner
- GEARIN, AMY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with V EXTREME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MIAO-LI COUNTY, TW
TAINAN SCIENCE-BASED INDUSTRIAL PARK, TW
TAINAN SCIENCE-BASED INDUSTRIAL PARK, TW
TAINAN SCIENCE-BASED INDUSTRIAL PARK, TW
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MORTON J. ROSENBERG
MORTON J. ROSENBERG ROSENBERG, KLEIN & LEE3458 ELLICOTT CENTER DRIVE-SUITE 101ELLICOTT CITY, MD 21043UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY (LCD) TELEVISIONS; LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY (LCD) MONITORS; LCD NOTEBOOK COMPUTERS; TELEVISIONS; NOTEBOOK COMPUTERS; COMPUTERS; COMPUTER MONITORS; PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS (PDAs); MOBILE TELEPHONES; VEHICLE TELEPHONES; TELEPHONES; ELECTRIC MONITORS, NAMELY, VIDEO MONITORS; VIDEO CAMERAS; AIRCRAFT COMMUNICATORS, NAMELY, AERONAUTICAL RADIO COMMUNICATION MACHINES AND APPARATUS; AND VIDEO GAME MACHINES FOR USE WITH TELEVISIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INNOLUX CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS CORP.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named V EXTREME
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 22, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 31, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 10, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 22, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 6, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |