CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for FIBROMATRIX

USPTO serial 78759198

FIBROMATRIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAHONEY, PAULA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FIBROMATRIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Milton Wolson, Angelo Notaro, Peter C. Michalos, John Zaccaria, Chih Sheng Lin, Carlita J. Solano

Milton Wolson, Angelo Notaro, Peter C. Michalos, J Notaro & Michalos P.C.100 Dutch Hill RoadSuite 110Orangeburg, NY 10962

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemicals used in industry and science, namely, biodegradable matrices and compositions comprising proteins, especially protein gluesACTIVE—
005Pharmaceutical and veterinary preparations, namely, biodegradable matrices and compositions comprising proteins, namely, protein glues for the treatment of wounds and for use as wound closing/sealing/healing preparation and for use as prevention of post-operative adhesions following surgery; protein glues for control of bleeding or homeostasisACTIVE—
042Scientific and technological services in research and design relating to the production and development of biodegradable matrices and compositions comprising proteins, especially protein gluesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 3, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 19, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 23, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 23, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 1, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 6, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 17, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 21, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 21, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 7, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 6, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 6, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 20, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 19, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 28, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 1, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 1, 2006ZZAXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE WITHDRAWN-TIMELY AAU—
Jul 21, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jun 24, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 20, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 4, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 26, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 29, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance