Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78759300?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78759300. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns APPLECOURT FERN?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78759300, the listed owner(s) include: Casa Flora, Inc..

What is USPTO serial number 78759300?

Serial number 78759300 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark APPLECOURT FERN. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of APPLECOURT FERN?

APPLECOURT FERN (78759300) currently shows USPTO status code 614 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover APPLECOURT FERN?

The public record lists International Classes: 031. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 78759300

APPLECOURT FERN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614

Filing date: Nov 22, 2005
Status date: Apr 9, 2010
Registration date: —
Examiner: TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
Law office: PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with APPLECOURT FERN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Casa Flora, Inc.
Dallas, TX
Other trademarks owned by Casa Flora, Inc.

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
031	PLUG STARTER PLANTS	ACTIVE	—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Apr 9, 2010	PETD	PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED	—
Feb 22, 2010	PINM	INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED	—
Feb 17, 2010	APET	ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF	—
Feb 17, 2010	PETR	PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED	—
Jun 13, 2009	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Jun 10, 2009	UNPR	UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED	—
Jun 10, 2009	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 10, 2009	PROA	TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED	—
May 8, 2009	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 8, 2009	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 7, 2008	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 2008	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 2008	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2008	PETG	PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED	—
Sep 16, 2008	PROA	TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED	—
Jul 21, 2008	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 21, 2008	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 20, 2007	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2007	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2007	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2007	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Nov 29, 2007	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Nov 8, 2007	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Nov 7, 2007	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 6, 2007	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2007	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 6, 2007	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 18, 2007	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Oct 18, 2007	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Oct 18, 2007	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Sep 10, 2007	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 5, 2007	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
Mar 30, 2007	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 29, 2007	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2007	PETG	PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED	—
Jan 31, 2007	PROA	TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED	—
Jan 5, 2007	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 5, 2007	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 5, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2006	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Nov 29, 2005	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—