USPTO serial 78759621
IGR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NEVILLE, BRIAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IGR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SUSAN M BELIVEAU
SUSAN M. BELIVEAU#202, 5005 24TH STREETVERNON, V1T 8X7CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Laser equipment designed for inscribing gemstones; optical hardware and computer software for reading, scanning, tracking, identifying and registering laser inscriptions in gemstones | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Operation of a business for others, namely, inscribing gemstones; operation of a website providing information to others on gemstone inscribing | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Operation of a business for others, namely, registering, identifying, verifying and tracking inscribed gemstones, and certifying gemstones with respect to their palce of origin, method of production, processing, finishing, character, quality and transactional history; operation of a website providing information to others on gemstones and gemstone registration, identification and tracking | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2008 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Dec 15, 2008 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 20, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 5, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |