CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for WORKPLACE WARFARE

USPTO serial 78759785

WORKPLACE WARFARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
IN, SUNG HYUN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WORKPLACE WARFARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael B. Lindley

7 Moet Ct.Rancho Mirage, CA 92270UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Instructional books providing techniques for resolving conflict in the workplace and creating a more successful employee and employerACTIVE—
041Seminars providing techniques for resolving conflict in the workplace and creating a more successful employee and employerACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 6, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 6, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 6, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 3, 2009TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Mar 3, 2009PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 3, 2009PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 5, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 5, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 14, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 13, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Aug 13, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 13, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 6, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 4, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 5, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 12, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 25, 2008PGEXPETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED—
Mar 25, 2008PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Mar 25, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 5, 2008PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Feb 6, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 6, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 5, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 4, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 5, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 5, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 12, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 23, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 24, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 14, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 10, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 20, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 10, 2006GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jun 10, 2006CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
May 26, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 29, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance