Drawing for MIGHTY OATS

USPTO serial 78759838

MIGHTY OATS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAVACHE, LINDA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MIGHTY OATS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MITCHELL P BROOK

MITCHELL P BROOK LUCE FORWARD HAMILTON & SCRIPPS LLP11988 EL CAMINO REAL STE 200SAN DIEGO, CA 92130-2594UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Brochures and newsletters concerning nutrition and food products; printed recipesACTIVE—
029Soups; chili; frozen soups, frozen chili; frozen stews; frozen foods, namely, veggie burger pattiesACTIVE—
030Oatmeal; breakfast cereals; processed cereals; processed oats; oat flakes; crushed oats; rolled oats; groats; cereal based snack food; oat based snack food; ready to eat, cereal derived food bars; ready to eat, oat derived food bars; frozen cereal; frozen cereal with fruit; frozen cereal with yogurt; frozen cereal bars; frozen cereal bars with fruit; frozen cereal bars with yogurt; frozen granola bars; frozen granola bars with fruit; frozen granola bars with yogurt; frozen cookies; frozen cookies with yogurt; frozen cookies with fruit; frozen burrito and wrap fillings, containing grain; frozen foods, namely cereal-based energy bars, waffles, cookie dough, bread dough, bagel dough, pizza dough, soft pretzels, tortillas, muffins, pancakes, oat cluster snacks, grain-based chips, crackers, cakes, cupcakes, pies, hand pies, pudding, tapioca, yogurt, rice pilaf, risotto, and processed-grain foods in plastic or paper tubesACTIVE—
031Raw oats; unprocessed oats; unprocessed cerealsACTIVE—
042Product development; product development for others; product development consultation; product research and development; advisory services in the field of food product development; food research; testing of foodstuffsACTIVE—
044Providing databases and information pertaining to nutrition and health via the Internet and other electronic communications networks; providing links to websites of others featuring nutrition and health via the Internet and other electronic communications networksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 2, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 2, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 19, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 30, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 30, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 19, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 19, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 19, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 30, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 15, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 7, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 18, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 20, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 18, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 5, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 29, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 29, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 29, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 26, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 25, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 25, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 1, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 1, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 13, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 30, 2005MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Nov 29, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance