USPTO serial 78760171
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin Schwimmer
Martin Schwimmer Schwimmer Mitchell Law Firm7 Bayberry DriveMt. Pleasant, NY 10570UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Hearing aids, hearing aid batteries, hearing aid covers; signal processing chips, sound processing chips; headsets for the hearing impaired, electronic devices for the hearing impaired, sound processing systems for the hearing impaired, telecommunications devices for the hearing impaired; software for use in the field of audiology; software for use in the field of sound processing; medical devices for testing hearing, medical devices for fitting hearing aids, cochlear implants, retail services via the Internet, mail order and in-store, in the field of electronic devices and hearing aids for the hearing impaired; audiological services; hearing aid fitting services; consulting services to others in the field of audiological services and fitting hearing aids; information services in the field of audiology and hearing aids | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2007 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| May 16, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 8, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 5, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |