USPTO serial 78760687
WILD HARE ON ST. ANDREWS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, RONALD G
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WILD HARE ON ST. ANDREWS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert E. Bushnell
ROBERT E BUSHNELL ROBERT E BUSHNELL LAW FIRM2029 K STREET NWSUITE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20006 1004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | PERSONAL BEAUTY SERVICES, NAMELY, COLORING, COSMETIC APPLICATION, CLEANSING, CUTTING, DYING, GLOSSING, HIGHLIGHTING, POLISHING, STREAKING, STYLING, TRIMMING, UNDERSTATING AND WAXING, OF HAIR, SKIN AND NAILS, FACIALS, MASSAGES, MANICURES, PEDICURES AND MAKE-UP, FOR MEN, WOMEN AND CHILDREN, HAIR CARE SERVICES, NAMELY, SINGLE PROCESS HAIR COLOR, DOUBLE PROCESS HAIR COLOR, SPECIALIZED TECHNIQUES AND HAIR WEAVING, HAND AND FOOT SERVICES, NAMELY, MANICURES AND PEDICURES, SALON SERVICES, NAMELY, PERSONAL BODILY CARE, COLORING, COSMETIC APPLICATION, CLEANSING, CUTTING, DYING, GLOSSING, HIGHLIGHTING, POLISHING, STREAKING, STYLING, TRIMMING, UNDERSTATING AND WAXING, OF HAIR, SKIN AND NAILS, MANICURES, PEDICURES AND MAKE-UP FOR MEN, WOMEN AND CHILDREN, AND SPA SERVICES, NAMELY, PERSONAL BODILY CARE, COLORING, COSMETIC APPLICATIONS, CLEANSING, CUTTING, DYING, GLOSSING, HIGHLIGHTING, POLISHING, STYLING, STREAKING, TRIMMING, UNDERSTATING AND WAXING, OF HAIR, skin AND NAILS, FACIALS, MASSAGES, MANICURES, PEDICURES AND MAKE-UP, FOR MEN, WOMEN AND CHILDREN | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2012 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 11, 2009 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 24, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 6, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 28, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 28, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |