USPTO serial 78760920
DE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOSID, ROBIN S
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher J. Falkowski
CHRISTOPHER J FALKOWSKI FALKOWSKI PLLCPO BOX 650NOVI, MI 48376-0650UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Application service provider (ASP), namely, hosting computer software applications of others; Computer code conversion for others; Computer consultation; Computer consultation in the field of computer security; Computer diagnostic services; Computer disaster recovery planning; Computer graphics services; Computer hardware development; Computer network design for others; Computer programming for others; Computer project management services; Computer security service, namely, restricting access to and by computer networks to and of undesired web sites, media and individuals and facilities; Computer service, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of knowledge management to host computer application software for creating searchable databases of in formation and data; Computer service, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of knowledge management to host computer application software for searching and retrieving information from databases and computer networks;; Computer service, namely, acting as an application service provider in the field of knowledge management to host computer application software for the collection, editing, organizing, modifying, book marking, transmission, storage and sharing of data and information; Computer services, namely monitoring and reporting on the performance, availability, and errors of websites of others; Computer services, namely monitoring, testing, analyzing, and reporting on the Internet traffic control and content control of the websites of others; Computer services, namely, creating and maintaining web sites for others; Computer services, namely, data recovery services; Computer services, namely, designing and implementing network web pages for others; Computer services, namely, designing and implementing web sites for others; Computer services, namely, filtering of unwanted e-mails; Computer services, namely, managing web sites for others; Computer services, namely, monitoring the websites of others to improve scalability and performance of websites of others; Computer services, namely, remote and on-site management of electronic messaging systems and applications for others; Computer site design; Computer software consultation; Computer software design for others; Computer software development; Computer systems analysis; Computer virus protection services; Consultation services in the fields of selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Customization of computer hardware and software; Design and development of online computer software systems; Design and maintenance of computer sites for third parties; Design of home pages, computer software and web sites; Displaying the web sites and images of others on a computer server; Hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network; Installation of computer software; Integration of computer systems and networks; Leasing of computers; Maintenance of computer software; Providing a website that features information on computer technology and programming; Recovery of computer data; Registration of domain names for identification of users on a global computer network; Rental of computers and software; Repair of computer software; Repair of damaged computer programs; Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems; Updating of computer programs for third parties; Updating of computer software for others | ACTIVE | Nov 4, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 30, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 31, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |