USPTO serial 78760933
PRONOSTICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROBERTSON, DEIRDRE G
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRONOSTICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SMARTBEAD TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
CAMBRIDGE, GB
CAMBRIDGE CB2 4AT, GB
CAMBRIDGE CB2 4AT, GB
UPPSALA, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay K. Meadway
Jay K. Meadway Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC50 South 16th StreetTwo Liberty Place, 22nd FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CHEMICAL REAGENTS AND ENCODED MICROPARTICLES FOR SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH USED FOR ANALYZING CHEMICALS, CELLS, PROTEINS, NUCLEIC ACIDS AND OTHER MOLECULES IN THE HEALTHCARE, DIAGNOSTICS, ENVIRONMENTAL, AGRICULTURAL, FOOD, PHARMACEUTICAL, BIOTECHNOLOGY, AND MATERIAL SCIENCE INDUSTRIES ; CHEMICAL REAGENTS AND ENCODED MICROPARTICLES FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH USED FOR ANALYZING CHEMICALS, CELLS, PROTEINS, AND NUCLEIC ACIDS IN THE HEALTHCARE, DIAGNOSTICS, ENVIRONMENTAL, AGRICULTURAL, FOOD, PHARMACEUTICAL, BIOTECHNOLOGY, AND MATERIAL SCIENCE INDUSTRIES | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS AND EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, COMPUTER-CONTROLLED FLUID HANDLING ROBOTICS FOR USE IN LABORATORIES, COMPUTER-CONTROLLED READERS FOR READING AND ANALYZING THE RESULTS OF MICROPARTICLE BASED ASSAYS, MICROPARTICLES, COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE SYSTEMS, SOLD AS A UNIT OR SEPARATELY, COMPRISED OF A COMPUTER, A COMPUTER CONTROLLED MICROSCOPE, A COMPUTER CONTROLLED MOTORIZED MOVING STAGE AND A COMPUTER CONTROLLED CAMERA FOR IMAGE CAPTURE READING AND ANALYZING THE RESULTS OF MICROPARTICLE BASED ASSAYS, SOLD SEPARATELY OR TOGETHER WITH SOFTWARE FOR USE IN REPORTING AND ANALYZING THE RESULTS OF THE MICROPARTICLE BASED ASSAYS, FOR ANALYZING IN THE LIFE SCIENCE, PHARMACEUTICAL, BIOTECHNOLOGY, AND MATERIAL SCIENCE INDUSTRIES, AND ELECTRONIC AND DOWNLOADABLE PUBLICATIONS IN THE NATURE OF JOURNALS AND INSTRUCTIONAL AND TEACHING MATERIALS IN THE FIELD OF RESEARCH IN THE HEALTHCARE, DIAGNOSTICS, ENVIRONMENTAL, AGRICULTURAL, FOOD, PHARMACEUTICAL, BIOTECHNOLOGY, AND MATERIAL SCIENCE INDUSTRIES | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed matter, namely, instructional and teaching materials and journals in the field of research in the healthcare, diagnostics, environmental, agricultural, food, pharmaceutical, biotechnology, and material science industries | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL RESEARCH SERVICES; DESIGN OF COMPUTER-CONTROLLED FLUID HANDLING ROBOTICS OF COMPUTER-CONTROLLED READERS, OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE, AND OF MULTIPLEXED OR PROFILING ASSAYS FOR DIAGNOSTIC OR RESEARCH PURPOSES; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING, SEQUENCING DNA, GENOTYPING, HIGH THROUGHPUT SCREENING ASSAYS FOR CLINICAL DIAGNOSTICS, PROTEOMICS ANALYSIS IN THE LIFE SCIENCE, PHARMACEUTICAL, BIOTECHNOLOGY, AND MATERIAL SCIENCE INDUSTRIES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SMARTBEAD TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by PRONOSTICS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by PRONOSTICS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by PHADIA AB
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PRONOSTICS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 25, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 23, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 21, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 11, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 11, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 25, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 1, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 28, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 20, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 5, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 4, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |