Drawing for ROBOWARRIOR

USPTO serial 78761142

ROBOWARRIOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROBOWARRIOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard R. Fine

Howard R. Fine Howard R. Fine, Attorney at Law2100 Sanders Road, Suite 200Northbrook, IL 60062UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic diaries and calculators; Interactive video game programs; Video game software; Video game cartridges; Video game discs; Video game machines for use with televisions; Computer programs for playing games; CamerasACTIVE
028Hand-held unit for playing electronic games; Floor-standing units for playing electronic games other than in conjunction with a television or computer; Toy computers; Electronic learning toys; Board games; Electronic game equipment with a watch function; Hand held unit for playing video games; Hand-held games with liquid crystal displays; LCD game machines; Tabletop units for playing electronic games other than in conjunction with a television or computer; Toy, namely, battery-powered computer game with LCD screen which features animation and sound effects; Electronic toy figures; Electronic toy robotsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 25, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 3, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 18, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 17, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 23, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 3, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Dec 4, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 4, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 15, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 25, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 25, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 25, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 2, 2006GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 2, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 2, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 1, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance