Drawing for TARGET STUDIO

USPTO serial 78761694

TARGET STUDIO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KOVALSKY, LAURA G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TARGET STUDIO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dr. Kenneth I. Kohn

Dr. Kenneth I. Kohn Kohn & AssociatesSuite 41030500 Northwestern HighwayFarmington Hills, MI 48334

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer middleware that enables users to develop and deploy web-based clinical trial applications without HTML, VISUAL BASIC, WEB SERVER and TCP/IP skillsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 12, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 12, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 12, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 12, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 12, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 12, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 18, 2008PGEXPETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED—
Apr 7, 2008PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Apr 7, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2008PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Feb 28, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 28, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 12, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 12, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 6, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 12, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 12, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 19, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 30, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 26, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 21, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 10, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 10, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 10, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 10, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 10, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 1, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jun 8, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 2, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 1, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 1, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 31, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance