Drawing for RUST ATTACK

USPTO serial 78761958

RUST ATTACK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WHITE, RICHARD F
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RUST ATTACK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002Coatings for use in the replenishing of corroded or rusted metal surfacesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 12, 2009PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jan 9, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2008PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Nov 13, 2008APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Nov 6, 2008PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 2, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 1, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 9, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 19, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 5, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 5, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 26, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 26, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 26, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 4, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 4, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 3, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 3, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 8, 2006CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2006GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2006CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
May 31, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 2, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance