Drawing for CLEAR COMFORT

USPTO serial 78762056

CLEAR COMFORT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HABEEB, MYRIAH A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CLEAR COMFORT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Glenn H. Lenzen

Glenn H. Lenzen Shughart Thomson & Kilroy1050 17th Street, Suite 2300Denver, CO 80265UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Technological devices for improving acoustic clarity and audio transmission and reception for assisting persons with sensory or cognitive impairments and to preserve hearing levels, namely, adapted stereo headphones, adapted telephones, adapted hands-free cordless telephone units, and adapted computer-telephone, cellular telephone and voice over internet protocol telephone headset units; electronic devices for assisting persons with sensory or cognitive impairments, namely, stereo audio amplification units, and radio audio amplification units; electronic units for minimizing or eliminating electromagnetic audio interferences; voice over internet protocol telephones, and emergency telephones, all adapted for assisting persons with sensory or cognitive impairments, and to preserve hearing levelsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 6, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Jul 20, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 20, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 19, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Dec 19, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Dec 19, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 20, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 20, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 25, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Jun 19, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jun 19, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 19, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Dec 19, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Dec 19, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 15, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 15, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jul 24, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jul 24, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Jun 19, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 27, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 7, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 12, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 12, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 9, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 13, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 13, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 25, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 25, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jun 15, 2006GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 15, 2006CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 31, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 24, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 24, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 2, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance