USPTO serial 78762313
AGION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AGION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward K Welch II
Edward K Welch II IP&L SOLUTIONS2308 Harrier RunNAPLES, FL 34105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Tableware, namely, forks, spoons, and knives; carving sets consisting of small and large knives; kitchen cutlery, hunting knives, pocket knives; pen knives; razors; razor blades; saws, files, chisels; hand-held cutting tools; hair removing tweezers; nail files, nail nippers, nail scissors; scissors and multi-purpose shears | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 17, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 20, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 14, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 14, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 9, 2009 | ICNA | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 28, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 17, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 23, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 3, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 20, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |