Drawing for CHARGEITPRO

USPTO serial 78762316

CHARGEITPRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HETZEL, DANNEAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHARGEITPRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gregory J. Marcot

SUZANNE REHMANI KRING & CHUNG LLP38 CORPORATE PARKIRVINE, CA 92694-9782UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for database management in the field of processing of credit, debit, check, electronic check, electronic benefits, food stamps and identity check transactionsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 17, 2007MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Apr 17, 2007ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Apr 16, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Jan 9, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 20, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 21, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 10, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 2, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Dec 3, 2005MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED
Dec 2, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance