USPTO serial 78762393
LIFT MD AESTHETICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 30, 2009
- Examiner
- CARL III, FRED
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with LIFT MD AESTHETICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gerard V. Kassabian
Gerard V. Kassabian Law Offices of Gerard V. Kassabian9440 S. Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 708Beverly Hills, CA 90210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | [ Age retardant gel; Age spot reducing creams; Anti-aging cream; Anti-freckle creams; Anti-wrinkle cream; Anti-wrinkle creams; Bath gel; Bath gels; Bath oils for cosmetic purposes; ] Beauty creams; [ Beauty creams for body care; Beauty gels; Bleaching preparations for cosmetic purposes; Body and beauty care cosmetics; Body cream; Body cream soap; Body creams; Body mask cream; Cleansing creams; Cosmetic creams; Cosmetic creams for skin care; Cosmetic oils; Cosmetic oils for the epidermis; Cosmetic preparations for body care; Cosmetic preparations for skin renewal; ] Cosmetics; [ Cream soaps; Creams for cellulite reduction; Cuticle cream; Depilatory creams; Exfoliant creams; Eye cream; Eye gels; Face and body beauty creams; Face and body creams; ] Face creams; [ Face creams for cosmetic use; Facial cream; Facial creams; Fair complexion cream; Gel eye masks; Gel for beauty and aesthetics to be applied to the skin, hair and nails; Hair care creams; Hair creams; Hair gel; Hair removing cream; Hand cream; Hand creams; Lip cream; Make-up removing milk, gel, lotions and creams; Night cream; Perfumed creams; Petroleum jelly for cosmetic purposes; Shower creams; Shower gels; Skin cleansing cream; ] Skin cream [ ; Skin creams; Skin creams in liquid and in solid form; Skin creams in liquid and solid; Skin creams in liquid and solid form; Skin gels for accelerating, enhancing or extending tans; Vanishing cream; Wrinkle resistant cream ] | ACTIVE | Dec 17, 2005 |
| 005 | [ Dressings for surgery ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 17, 2005 |
| 010 | Medical treatment apparel; Operating room apparel | ACTIVE | Dec 17, 2005 |
| 025 | [ Jackets; Knit shirts; Night shirts; ] Pants; [ Polo shirts; ] Shirts; [ Short-sleeved or long-sleeved t-shirts; Short-sleeved shirts; Skirts; Sleep shirts; Sport shirts; Sports shirts; Sports shirts with short sleeves; Sweat shirts; Sweaters; T-shirts; Tops, ] to be sold only through medical service providers, cosmetics retailers and estheticians, none of which may be in department stores | ACTIVE | Dec 17, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Garo Kassabian, M.D., Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Garo Kassabian, M.D., Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Garo Kassabian, M.D., Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named LIFT MD AESTHETICS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2018 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 8, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 31, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 5, 2015 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 26, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 20, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 4, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 17, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 5, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 21, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 14, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 27, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 14, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 21, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 14, 2007 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2007 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 3, 2007 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |