USPTO serial 78762829
Serial No. 78762829
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 78762829?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Boulder Creek, CA
Boulder Creek, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Juan Carlos A. Marquez
Juan Carlos A. Marquez Stites & Harbison1199 North Fairfax StreetSuite 900Alexandria, VA 22314-1437Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Power tools, namely drills, routers, screwdrivers, wire cutters and saws, having ergonomic handles | ACTIVE | — |
| 008 | Manual hand tools, namely hammers, screwdrivers, wrenches, pliers, vise grips, saws, wire cutters, planers, drills and shovels | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Ergonomic handles for handheld medical and surgical instruments | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Ergonomic handlebars for bicycles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Tillim, Stephen L.
- Other trademarks owned by Tillim, Stephen L.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 25, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 27, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 25, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 26, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 3, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 20, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 20, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 5, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |