USPTO serial 78763037
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brad D. Rose
Brad D. Rose Pryor Cashman LLP7 Times SquareNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | BED BLANKETS, RECEIVING BLANKETS, BLANKET THROWS, COMFORTERS, COMFORTER SETS AND ENSEMBLES COMPRISING COMFORTERS, DUST RUFFLES, QUILTS, AFGHANS, BED LINEN, BED SHEETS AND BED SHEET SETS, BED SPREADS, COVERLETS, BED SKIRTS, BED PADS, FEATHER BEDS, BED CANOPIES, PILLOW CASES, PILLOW COVERS, AND SHAMS, MATTRESS COVERS AND PADS, COVERS FOR CUSHIONS, DUVETS AND DUVET COVERS, EIDERDOWNS AND EIDERDOWN COVERS; CRIB BUMPERS, CRIB SHEETS, CRIB COMFORTERS, CRIB DUST RUFFLES, FABRIC DIAPER STACKERS FOR STACKING DIAPERS AND BLANKETS; DRAPERY AND DRAPERIES, SHROUDS, SWAGS, KITCHEN TOWELS, DISH CLOTHS, TABLE CLOTHS NOT OF PAPER, DUST RUFFLES, POT HOLDERS, BARBECUE MITTS, OVEN MITTS, TABLE LINEN, TEXTILE PLACE MATS, TEXTILE NAPKINS, CLOTH AND FELT PENNANTS, TOWELS, BATH LINEN, WASH CLOTHS, AND SHOWER CURTAINS; VINYL, CLOTH TEXTILES AND FABRICS FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF CLOTHING, FOOTWEAR, LUGGAGE, BEDDING, LINENS, UPHOLSTERY AND HOME FURNISHINGS; WATERPROOF FABRIC FOR MANUFACTURING CLOTHING, FURNITURE AND LUGGAGE; TAFFETA, TULLE, FOULARD, FRIEZE, BUCKRAM, CALICO, AND BROCADE; TEXTILE FABRICS FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF CLOTHING; TEXTILE FABRICS FOR LINGERIE; TEXTILE LABELS; TEXTILE USED AS LININGS FOR CLOTHING; TEXTILE SUBSTITUTE MATERIALS MADE FROM SYNTHETIC MATERIALS; COTTON FABRIC, COTTON BASE MIXED FABRICS, AND WASTE COTTON FABRICS; WOOLEN CLOTH, WOOLEN FABRIC, WOOL-COTTON MIXED FABRICS, WOOL YARN FABRICS, AND WOOL BASE MIXED FABRICS; SILK CLOTH, SILK FABRIC FOR PRINTING PATTERNS, SILK BASE MIXED FABRICS, SILK-COTTON MIXED FABRICS, SILK-WOOL MIXED FABRICS, SPUN SILK FABRICS, AND HAND SPUN SILK FABRICS; HEMP CLOTH, TRUE HEMP FABRICS, HEMP BASE MIXED FABRICS, HEMP-COTTON MIXED FABRICS, HEMP-SILK MIXED FABRICS, AND HEMP-WOOL MIXED FABRICS; BILLIARD CLOTH, FLANNEL, FLAX CLOTH, JUTE CLOTH, SACKCLOTH, GAUZE FABRIC, CHENILLE FABRIC, CHEVIOT FABRIC, WORSTED FABRICS, ZEPHYR FABRIC, AND SYNTHETIC FIBER FABRICS; FELT AND NON-WOVEN TEXTILE FABRICS; FELTS AND FELT CLOTH; WOVEN FELT; COVERED RUBBER YARN FABRICS, ESPARTO FABRIC, FABRIC CASCADES, FABRIC FOR BOOTS AND SHOES, FABRIC OF IMITATION ANIMAL SKIN, ELASTIC FABRICS FOR CLOTHING, JERSEY FABRICS FOR CLOTHING, KNITTED FABRICS, RAYON FABRIC, RAMIE FABRICS, SEMI-SYNTHETIC FIBER FABRICS, REGENERATED FIBER YARN FABRICS, ELASTIC YARN MIXED FABRICS, FIBERGLASS FABRICS FOR TEXTILE USE; KIT COMPRISED OF FABRICS FOR MAKING QUILTS; UPHOLSTERY FABRICS; TEXTILE WALL HANGINGS; TAPESTRIES OF TEXTILE; FABRICS, LINENS AND RIBBONS USED IN DRESSING CHAIRS AND CUSHIONS FOR USE IN CONNECTION WITH SPECIAL EVENTS AND PARTIES | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | ORNAMENTAL RIBBONS OF TEXTILE USED IN DECORATING CHARS AND CUSHIONS FOR USE IN CONNECTION WITH SPECIAL EVENTS AND PARTIES | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 21, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 23, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 26, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 18, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 26, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 22, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 20, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 20, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 8, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 22, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 7, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 23, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |