Drawing for NO HAY TORTILLA MÁS SABROSA Y SUAVECITA QUE LA DEL PAQUETE DE LA BANDERITA

USPTO serial 78763087

NO HAY TORTILLA MÁS SABROSA Y SUAVECITA QUE LA DEL PAQUETE DE LA BANDERITA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHOE, KELLY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NO HAY TORTILLA MÁS SABROSA Y SUAVECITA QUE LA DEL PAQUETE DE LA BANDERITA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul S. Owens

Paul S. Owens PAUL OWENS & ASSOCIATESPO BOX 15310ATLANTA, GA 30333-0310UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030TortillasACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 23, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 23, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 15, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 13, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 13, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 31, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 31, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 29, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Oct 29, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 29, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 16, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 9, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jul 9, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 9, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 26, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 24, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 3, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 26, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 26, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 26, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 18, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 24, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 23, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 23, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 23, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 24, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 1, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 12, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 14, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 13, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 25, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 23, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 5, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance