USPTO serial 78763130
MAMA ALDENTINO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCRAY, RENEE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAMA ALDENTINO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Alan S. Cooper
Alan S. Cooper HOWREY LLP2941 FAIRVIEW PARK DR STE 200FALLS CHURCH, VA 22042-2924UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat; fish not live; food products made from fish and/or shellfish, namely, fish cakes, fish croquettes, fish sticks; processed meat; processed beans; preserved, dried and cooked fruits; processed frozen fruits; pre-cooked frozen foods consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry and/or vegetables; jellies; eggs and processed eggs; soups; fermented bean; fried soybean curd; soybean curd frozen and then dried; jelly made from devil's tongue root; soybean milk; tofu; protein for human consumption; whey-based food beverages; milk and milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; skim milk powder; egg powder | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Pasta sauces, namely, ready prepared sauces containing meat or fish for pasta and noodles, ready prepared meat sauces containing meat, ready prepared Bolognese sauces containing meat or fish, ready prepared Carbonara sauces containing meat, ready prepared sauce containing tarako (salted cod roe), sauces containing salted cod roe, with none of the foregoing sauces being condiments and none of the foregoing sauces being mustard-based sauces or pepper mustard-based sauces; coffee; cocoa; tea; sugar; honey; rice; husked oats; husked barley; flour for food; gluten for food; cereal preparations, namely, processed cereals; noodles; pasta; boiled and dried noodles; prepared entrees consisting primarily of rice or pasta; dumplings; fish dumplings; sandwiches; sushi; hamburger sandwiches; pizzas; boxed lunches, namely, hot dog sandwiches and rice-based bento; hot dog sandwiches; meat pies; ravioli; bread; crackers; biscuits; buns; cakes; pies; cookies; preparations for making instant cakes, cookies or puddings; preparations for making ice creams or sherbets; ice creams; sherbets; batter mix, namely, dry blend of flour; almond paste; yeast powder; yeast; baking powder; meat tenderizers; sake cake; food starch; breader mix, namely, flour based bread crumb or cracker meal; tempura batter mix, namely, batter mix for making tempura; bread crumbs; tapioca; sago; artificial coffee; pastry and confectionery, namely, candy | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nisshin Seifun Group Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Nisshin Seifun Group Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named MAMA ALDENTINO
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 21, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 1, 2010 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 29, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 24, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 29, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 21, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 21, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 22, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 7, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |