Drawing for THE VOICE OF MEXICO

USPTO serial 78763360

THE VOICE OF MEXICO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEVINE, HOWARD B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE VOICE OF MEXICO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Credit card and calling card services in the field of telecommunicationsACTIVE—
038Telecommunication services, namely, personal communication services; telecommunication services, namely, internet connections, long distance telephone services, and local telephone services accessible by access code, computer terminals, telephone, televisions, radio, and teleprinter, electronic transmission of messages and coded images; electronic transmission of message and data; wireless digital messaging services; electronic store-and-forward messaging; electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals; providing telecommunications connections to the internet; facsimile transmission; electronic mail services; telephone communication servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 16, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 15, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 14, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 14, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 16, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 16, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 2, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 2, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 2, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 16, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 16, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 16, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 16, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 16, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 16, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 29, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 16, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 16, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 16, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 16, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 24, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 4, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 8, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 8, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 30, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 21, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 11, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 6, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance