Drawing for WATERMILLER

USPTO serial 78763514

WATERMILLER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3843172Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 31, 2010
Examiner
GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WATERMILLER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Raymond E. Farrell

ARLANA S COHEN COWEN LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN PC1133 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6799UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Temperature controlled beverage dispensing systems comprised of filtering, processing and storing units, for drinking water, spring water, flavored water, table water, aerated water, mineral water, soda water, carbonated water, non-carbonated water, and soft drinksSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDJun 10, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 9, 2012C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Feb 9, 2012CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 23, 2011CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Sep 8, 2010PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 31, 2010R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 27, 2010SUNANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2010REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 26, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 9, 2010CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jul 8, 2010SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 2, 2010AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 11, 2010IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 11, 2010EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Dec 15, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2009UNDRUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - CORRESP. REMAILED—
Nov 24, 2009EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 24, 2009EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 24, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 10, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 10, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 10, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 15, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 12, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 12, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 12, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 12, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 12, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 12, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 30, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 30, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 30, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 12, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 20, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 28, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 1, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 1, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 30, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 6, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 5, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 5, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance