Drawing for IMAGINE IT. BUILD IT. DELIVER IT.

USPTO serial 78763895

IMAGINE IT. BUILD IT. DELIVER IT.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HABEEB, MYRIAH A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IMAGINE IT. BUILD IT. DELIVER IT.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sanjiv Sarwate

SANJIV SARWATE PATTISHALL, MCAULIFFE, NEWBURY, HILLIARD311 S WACKER DR STE 5000CHICAGO, IL 60606-6631UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer operating program; computer operating systems; computer utility programs; computer programs for use in performance monitoring, session management, automated production and scheduling control, resource maximization and high volume transaction processing, and to control and ensure integrity of other computer programs; computer programs for use in word processing, document management; data retrieval, archival storage, calendaring, graphics, computer based training, calculations and the manipulation of spreadsheet data and spreadsheeting, and statistical analysis; computer programs for use in development of computer software applications, computer programs, and information processing systems, program and information processing systems development, computer programming, application analysis, software design and generation, computer aided software engineering, fourth generation computer programming, expert system development, human-computer interface development, and in language translation; computer programs for use in data processing, electronic mail, electronic bulletin boards, communication between different software files, communication within business entities, communication between various hardware and software environments, networking between different hardware systems, interface or integrate between networks of hardware, operating systems and/or software, interface between computer databases, and to communicate and interface between different computer platforms and in local area networks; computer programs for use in computer systems and applications development and information processing systems; computer programs for use in incident tracking and reporting and problem resolution, project management; computer programs for use in cataloging, inventory, to control circulation, and to otherwise control operation of a library; computer programs which provide information on product fixes, product maintenance and product information; computer programs acting as an applications programming interface and providing connections between various software applications running on different hardware and software platforms; and utilities related to all of the above functionsACTIVE—
042Computer programming services for others, computer program design services and consulting services in relation to computer programming for others and computer program design servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 4, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 19, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 8, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 13, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 24, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 26, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 26, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 8, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 21, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 20, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 23, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 23, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 16, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance