USPTO serial 78764118
MARKET CENTRE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBRAY, KATHERINE M
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MARKET CENTRE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
COMMERCE, CA
Commerce, CA
Commerce, CA
COMMERCE, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. MacDermott
Michael J. MacDermott CHRISTIE, PARKER & HALE, LLPPO BOX 7068PASADENA, CA 91109-7068UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | DOWNLOADABLE ELECTRONIC PUBLICATIONS IN THE NATURE OF BROCHURES, NEWSLETTERS, PAMPHLETS AND PERIODICALS PERTAINING TO THE RETAIL GROCERY INDUSTRY; DOWNLOADABLE ELECTRONIC PUBLICATIONS IN THE NATURE OF BROCHURES, NEWSLETTERS, PAMPHLETS AND PERIODICALS FOR CONSUMERS IN THE FIELD OF NUTRITION AND FOOD PREPARATION AND IN RELATION TO SHOPPING FOR AND SELECTION OF GROCERY PRODUCTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | PROVIDING ON-LINE PUBLICATIONS IN THE NATURE OF BROCHURES, NEWSLETTERS, PAMPHLETS AND PERIODICALS PERTAINING TO THE RETAIL GROCERY INDUSTRY; PROVIDING ON-LINE PUBLICATIONS IN THE NATURE OF BROCHURES; NEWSLETTERS; PAMPHLETS AND PERIODICALS FOR CONSUMERS IN THE FIELD OF NUTRITION AND FOOD PREPARATION AND IN RELATION TO SHOPPING FOR AND SELECTION OF GROCERY PRODUCTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by UNIFIED GROCERS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Unified Western Grocers, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Unified Western Grocers, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by UNIFIED GROCERS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named MARKET CENTRE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 4, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 4, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 27, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 28, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 12, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 26, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 26, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 25, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 29, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 6, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 14, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 8, 2005 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |