USPTO serial 78764465
QUEBEC'S ABORIGINAL FEASTS OF THE WILD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALTREE, NICHOLAS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with QUEBEC'S ABORIGINAL FEASTS OF THE WILD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK HARRISON
MARK HARRISON VENABLE LLP575 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-1607UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Prepared meals namely, prepared meals consisting principally of meat and/or vegetables and/or pasta and/or fish and/or seafood; meat, poultry, fish and seafood of all kind; boneless chicken; meat loaves; chicken flakes; ham flakes; blood sausage; pickled tongues; stews namely, meat ball stew, beef stew, chicken stew, Irish stew; ready-to-serve simmered dishes; ham terrines, chicken terrines; pates, namely liver pates, country-style pates, merchant pates, ham pates, pork pates, veal pates and chicken pates; spreads; chili spreads; condiments, namely ketchup, mayonnaise, mustard, relish and pickled foods; salad dressings; spices; pork beans; pastas; rice; soups; sauces namely, hot sandwich sauce, Bar-B-Q sauce, sauce for meat ball stew, sauce for meat loaves, sauce for poutine, dijonnaise, of Bordeaux, sauce for meat, beef sauce, three peppers sauce, sauce for poultry, sauce for fish, sauce for seafood, mushroom sauce, chicken sauce, turkey sauce; fruit jams; fruit jellies; peanut butter; honey; maple syrup; preserved, frozen, dried, in vacuum, crystallized, cooked, candied and fresh fruits; preserved, frozen, dried, in vacuum, cooked and fresh vegetables; non-alcoholic fruit juices, non-alcoholic fruit drinks, non-alcoholic vegetable juices; tea; coffee; bakery products namely, breads, muffins, cakes, bagels, croissants, pita, crumpets, waffles, brownies, tortes and pies; desserts namely, Danish pastries, doughnuts, crepes, cookies, mousse and puddings; cereals namely, breakfast cereals, cereal based snack food and cereal derived food bars; dairy products, namely milk, cream, sour cream, ice cream, yogurts, butter and cheese; seeds and nuts; snack foods, namely chocolate bars, candy, potato chips, popcorn, nachos, candies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 10, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |