USPTO serial 78764525
SCHWAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MUNSON OTT, MARY DEIRDRE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SCHWAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank J. Jordan
FRANK J JORDAN JORDAN & HAMBURG LLP122 E 42ND ST RM 4000NEW YORK, NY 10168-0069UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics; cosmetic pencils of all types, namely, eyebrow pencils, eyeliner pencils, kohl pencils, eyeshadow pencils, lipsticks, lip liner pencils, lip gloss, lip ink, covering and correcting pencils, concealers, pencils for cheeks and face, make-up removing pencils, perfume pencils, nail white pencils; mascara, powder, make-up, all these products as sharpenable pencils, retractable pencils, liquid liner pencils or in bottles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 12, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |