USPTO serial 78764680
DEAF ACCESS SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 15, 2008
- Examiner
- LEE, DOUGLAS
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DEAF ACCESS SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JUDITH L. CARLSON, REG. NO. 41,524
JUDITH L CARLSON STINSON MORRISON HE XPX NOT PROVIDEDSTINSON TRADEMARK A 1201 WALNUT, STEKANSAS CITY MO, MO 64106-2150UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Technical consultation services for businesses and governmental entities in the field of information technology solutions for professionals who are deaf, hard of hearing or speech impaired, and for their hearing colleagues in the business workplace | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 3, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | โ |
| Jan 22, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | โ |
| Jan 15, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | โ |
| Jan 15, 2008 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 13, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | โ |
| Dec 5, 2007 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | โ |
| Dec 5, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | โ |
| Dec 5, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | โ |
| Dec 5, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | โ |
| Dec 5, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | โ |
| Dec 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |
| Oct 11, 2007 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | โ |
| Oct 11, 2007 | GECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | โ |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | โ |
| Jul 31, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | โ |
| Jul 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Jul 30, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 30, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | โ |
| Jul 30, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | โ |
| Jul 30, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | โ |
| Jan 29, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 29, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 18, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | โ |
| Jan 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Jan 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | โ |
| Dec 18, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action โ typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |
| Dec 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | โ |