USPTO serial 78764755
KAUFFMAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BESCH, JAY C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KAUFFMAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Wilmington, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles W. Grimes
CHARLES W GRIMES GRIMES & BATTERSBY LLP488 MAIN AVE STE 3NORWALK, CT 06851-1008UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 034 | Cigars, little cigars, roll-your-own tobacco, pipe tobacco and smokeless tobacco | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 22, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 22, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 19, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 18, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 10, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |